Why is Obama trying to destroy charity organizations?

December 102009

by not allowing those who give to charitable organizations to write off what they give. What Obama is doing is going to destroy charitable organizations? Is Obama trying to destroy them on purpose? Why would he do that? Is it mostly because he wants government to control everything? Is this going to be the downfall of his presidency since God probably will not like Obama taking money from Him?

Because HE wants to control who gets money and who doesn’t.

If he controls it, he can only give money to people that are furthering his agenda and who support him.

It’s all about furthering his agenda and GETTING REELECTED.

20 Responses

  1. Maria 4 Champion is so awesome Says:

    All i can say is who cares
    References :

  2. Dio D Says:

    They will compete with his socialist programs.
    References :

  3. jo P Says:

    Obama is trying to help charity organizations. Republicans hate all charity. Republicans are destroying charity.

    Sammy, my very good friend
    Why are u assuming that about me? It sounds like u have some studying to do young man. Republicans have spoken out many times against charity. Face it. Facts are facts.

    Chucky, my very good friend
    Like I said earlier.
    It sounds like u have some studying to do young man. Republicans have spoken out many times against charity. Face it. Facts are facts.
    References :
    Excuse me chucky!
    so hard to take someone seriously when their name is "junior". I have presented the facts, gramps. Ur obviously out of touch with today’s reality. Face it. U have presented no facts. Just more karl rove tactics. U should really stop embarassing urself.

  4. J T Says:

    As Glenn Beck said, obama is evil.
    References :

  5. M&T Says:

    See it didn’t make you mad till he went there…to all you others just wait….you’ll get your turn…the NRA will most likly be next!
    References :

  6. Stephen K Says:

    He wants government playing a bigger role in "taking care of the poor" . If needy people are helped by compassionate people it doesn’t bring votes.
    References :

  7. Debra B Says:

    Because HE wants to control who gets money and who doesn’t.

    If he controls it, he can only give money to people that are furthering his agenda and who support him.

    It’s all about furthering his agenda and GETTING REELECTED.
    References :

  8. Barry O's gotta go! Says:

    It’s all part of his socialist plan.
    References :

  9. sammy Says:

    ARE YOU SERIOUS "JO P" Do you have any idea what you are saying?? Barry is destroying Charity, study up before you speak.
    References :

  10. .... Says:

    maybe because that kind of organizations use 1% of all donations
    the rest they just keep for itself
    References :

  11. Pluto C. Rat Says:

    I thought about it, and you don’t know what you’re talking about. Something "written off" is an unrecoverable asset.

    A donation to a charity is an "expense" or "cost," a certain percentage of which (or all) is counted against income, thereby reducing taxes owed (by the donor).

    Don’t write inflammatory questions like this anymore. You don’t even know the topics.

    Edit: And Christ said, "Give to Caesar that which is Caesar’s," explaining that money is not of God or belonged by God.
    References :

  12. Bum Head Says:

    Obviously he worships satan
    References :

  13. stoktrader Says:

    All charity is to flow from the government just like in Europe. Didn’t you get the memo. Now lets get in line and give in lockstep. Besides the government knows better which charities to support. Just pay your taxes.
    References :

  14. chuck_junior Says:

    He thinks that the Government should determine which charities should get donations.

    He’s also capping the amount of interest we can write off on a mortgage. That’s going to really boost the housing market…

    No,

    Really.

    BTW Jo. Conservatives donate MUCH more to charity than Libs. Do the research.

    You are correct. Facts are facts and you don’t have any on your side on this one.
    BTW, I’m probably old enough to be your father if not your grandfather. You got that fact wrong as well.
    References :
    Sarcasm. The other white meat.

  15. future fate Says:

    Where have you gotten your information?
    I don’t believe it for a minute – sounds like something some AM radio liar made up to scare old people.
    References :

  16. PrivacyNowPlease! Says:

    Could you give a source for that claim? Never mind, I looked it up for myself. It is hardly a "done deal" but just one of hundreds of proposals made during discussions about how to fix the economy:

    March 03, 2009

    Half of Wealthy Americans Say Taxes Don’t Affect Their Giving, Study Finds
    A majority of affluent Americans say their charitable giving would be unaffected by the elimination of federal tax provisions designed, in part, to encourage philanthropy, according to a new study by Bank of America and Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University.
    Nearly 52 percent of wealthy donors said their giving would remain the same if they no longer received any income-tax deduction for their donations, while 54 percent said their level of philanthropy would remain unchanged if the estate tax were repealed.
    That said, a significant minority (47 percent) of people in the survey reported that they would give less if they could no longer claim a deduction for their charitable gifts. Of those respondents, 37 percent said their contributions would “somewhat decrease,” while 10 percent said their gifts would “dramatically decrease.”
    References :

  17. professor_lumpy Says:

    You guys are all getting to damn ridiculous with you questions . Not one Worth answering today . Face it we are all going into the new world order . Nothing you guys can say going to change it and all to blind to see it coming
    References :

  18. Conservative Grandma Says:

    He doesn’t care!

    the mortgage interest deduction has always been the "sacred cow" of deductions and this twit wants to get rid of it! What an @ss!!!
    References :
    Obama is DANGEROUS!

  19. Answerman Says:

    He wants the governmant to be the charity. People dependant on governmant assistance = votes for Democrats so they can keep getting handouts. It’s the typical socialist formula.
    References :
    We must stop this evil man!

  20. TomT Says:

    Obama clearly has no regard for tradition and most assuredly no regard for Christianity and his supporters who think he’s a Christian are about three fruit loops short of a full brain cell. People, though, who give to charity for the most part don’t do it for the tax deduction although millions take a deduction for donations they never made. To that extent I have no problem with eliminating bogus deductions, but legitimate ones should be allowed with proof. In the end, though, all must be dependent upon the government or his administration will have failed in the eyes of most democrats and certainly in Obama’s for their goal is domination of we the people..
    References :

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

|